Christianity seems to have a new vocabulary: brokenness, messiness, hurt, etc. But how well do these new terms represent biblical ideas, problems, and language?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6f2/4a6f2f0b172fde1b14d4f62823e4a325e06e3fc9" alt=""
Christianity seems to have a new vocabulary: brokenness, messiness, hurt, etc. But how well do these new terms represent biblical ideas, problems, and language?
Are there different types of rights and how do we tell them apart?
We must be clear on what it does and does not mean for God to be “for us.” The soft prosperity gospel gets this 180 degrees backwards.
Do we only have to reply on what the Bible says, or is there eyewitness testimony about Jesus outside of Scripture?
Sometimes we can slip into an unhealthy pragmaticism with apologeitcs. We must remember that it is primarily for the glory of God!
We will all either have doubts or encounter those who do. So, how should we think about doubt biblically?
We need to be very clear in how we communicate the truths of Christianity, but even when we’re clear they likely will be rejected.
Many people have not considered how they know things, or if morality is knowable. We need to be prepared to help them think through that
Christianity affirms the virgin birth of Jesus, but Atheism has its own “virgin births” as well.
The reason for Christmas is explicitly linked to evil, and evil provides a great segue to Christmas and the gospel!